Skip to content

Raising climate change higher up on the political agenda at REDDX

IMG_5613-2_20
Towards the end of last month, Norway saw government officials, NGOs and corporations come together to discuss the implementation and capacity of REDD+ and raise the issue of forest protection and restoration higher up the global political agenda. A total of 47 countries convened in Norway to attend the Oslo REDD Exchange (REDDX).

REDD stands for “reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation”. A programme negotiated under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) at the Conferences of the Parties (COP), it is an effort to create a financial value for the carbon stored in forests. It offers incentives for developing countries to reduce emissions and invest in low-carbon paths to sustainable development. The financial reward comes from richer countries that support initiatives aimed at protecting and restoring forests.

Among the attendees of REDDX was U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, who emphasized that “trees […] are nature’s own carbon capture and storage mechanism”. He went on to urge for the protection of forests for biodiversity, air quality, water quality and indigenous people. Indeed, several speakers at the conference pushed for greater collaboration with indigenous peoples.

Though we remain some distance from securing the rise in global temperatures below the 2°C limit (above pre-industrial levels), the world is turning its attention, now more than ever, towards this important issue. The climate change agenda is now increasingly inherent in political discourse and policy making.

Germany’s Parliamentary State Secretary, Thomas Silberhorn, stresses the need to tackle climate change. “In the end”, he says, ”it’s a question of the survival of humankind”.

The original article is published on Mongabay.

Latest updates

 COP27: a look back as COP15 starts

COP27 was more about holding the bar set in Glasgow, rather than making any further strides forward. This is of course disappointing, but sadly not surprising in the face of significant pressure from countries where the political will is still wedded to fossil fuel based economies.