WeForest Project


Brazil, wildlife corridors

Restoring the Atlantic Forest to bring back wildlife
Area restored
1,021 ha

Project Summary

The Atlantic Forest has been reduced to green fragments due to unsustainable agriculture. This has affected the rich biodiversity in the area. WeForest is planting trees to reconnect these forest patches, creating more space for animals such as the endangered black lion tamarin so that they can thrive again.

  • Alt
    Black Lion Tamarins returning to their habitats thanks to the forest corridors.
  • Alt
    Drone footage of a wildlife corridor, allowing wildlife to return to their habitat.
  • Alt
    The nursery produces a wide range of native trees and plants are then sold to farmers.
  • Alt
    Empowering women at community-based nurseries.
  • Alt
    Native seeds collected from the standing forest.
  • Alt
    Jaguars returning to their habitats (camera trap footage) in one of the forest corridors.
  • BRA_Agroforestry
    Agroforestry system is key since it increases crop productivity.


Pontal do Paranapanema, western São Paulo state

Project Status


Restoration Approach

Framework planting
Assisted natural regeneration

Planting Period

November to March

Project Partners

IPE received the 2017 Award of Excellence from the Society for Ecological Restoration.
Laboratório de Silvicultura de Florestas Tropicais (LASTROP), Universidade de São Paulo; Instituto de Energia e Ambiente Universidade de Sao Paulo; Federal University of São Carlos; Instituto de pesquisas e estudos florestais.


Acacia polyphylla, Anadenathena spp., Cedrela fissilis, Cordia trichotoma, Colubrina glandulosa, Enterolobium contortisiliquum, Guazuma ulmifolia, Inga laurina, Inga uruguensis, Jacaranda cuspidifolia, Peltophorum dubium, Tabebuia spp.

Project Goals

Restore native forest
Reconnect the Morro do Diabo State Park to the Iguaçu National Park
Conserve biodiversity
Promote economic development
Build livelihood resilience

Latest Project News

Why is intervention needed?

Though the Atlantic Forest used to be 6 times the size of the United Kingdom, it is now only a forest in name. Over the course of 20 years, it has lost over 80% of its original forest cover due to agricultural expansion. No other large tropical forest has suffered this much loss.

Ecological restoration

In order to boost the forest recovery, we combine several restoration methods (i.e. assisted natural regeneration, framework species approach and farmer-assisted reforestation) which are chosen based on land ownership, level of degradation and the amounts of seeds present in the degraded soil. Agroforestry, yet another system, is also used when farmers are eager to directly improve their diet or grow their income. 

Livelihood development

We will win this battle against deforestation when people start making a living from restoring and protecting forests and not from cutting the trees. Community-based nurseries around the restoration sites are a good example and are ran by local female entrepreneurs. This allows them to become financially independent. Transplanting the produced seedlings to the final planting site provides another opportunity for income: members of the Brazilian Landless Workers Movement (Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra) are hired and learn valuable skills to finally make a decent living. Various trainings in forestry techniques are provided to the people of the community several times during the year.

A growing Team

Together with our local partner we employ 25 people, working in the 8 community nurseries.


* Carbon calculation methodology

This carbon figure is based on research conducted in the region of Pontal do Paranapanema. The total above-ground and below-ground biomass is estimated to average a sequestration of 317.24 tons of CO2 per hectare over a period of 30 years.

Ditt, E.H., Rocha, M. T., Padua, C.V. Estudos de viabilidade de projetos de carbono para mitigação climática, redução de pobreza e conservação da biodiversidade no Pontal do Paranapanema, São Paulo. In: Carlos Klink. (Ed.). Quanto mais quente melhor? 1ed. Brasília: Peirópolis, 2007, v. 1, p. 139-154.