The Brazilian Atlantic Forest is one of the most biodiverse forests in the world yet only 7% of the original forest remains as small, isolated fragments. Restoring the forest is extremely vital to safeguard the remaining biodiversity and combat the progressive loss of the world’s species and for our climate as well. The high carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forests in the Latin American tropics means the Atlantic Forest is a key player in the climate change agenda. A partnership with Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (IPÊ), the project aims to create forest corridors between remaining fragments, increasing tree cover and habitat connectivity for native species. The community-based nurseries, seed collection and planting activities are under the management of local people who, thanks to our project, are empowered to earn a living while restoring the forest.
Restore native forest
Reconnect the Morro do Diabo State Park to the Iguaçu National Park
Promote economic development
Build livelihood resilience
Why is intervention needed?
According to UNESCO, Brazil’s Atlantic Forest (Mata Atlantica) is one of the world’s five most important biodiversity hotspots. Once stretching 130 million hectares across Brazil's southeastern coast, the Atlantic Forest has been reduced to small isolated fragments, with some patches no larger than 50 hectares. In Pontal de Paranapanema, where the project is based, the extent of deforestation has left a mere 3% of the forest standing. Despite this extreme level of deforestation, the Atlantic Forest still harbors a wealth of biodiversity and has a large potential for carbon sequestration.
Forest corridors are created between the Morro do Diabo State Park and the Iguaçu National Park, where some of the few remnants of the Atlantic Forest are found. Small isolated populations are at risk from inbreeding and losing genetic diversity and forest corridors enable previously isolated individuals to move to new areas of forest and breed with other populations. For the critically endangered species, the black lion tamarin (Leontopithecus chrisopygus), this is essential if it is to survive. To identify where the corridors will benefit key species the most and inform decisions on where to plant, the movements of native feline species were tracked using GPS collars. The planting approach follows the succession-based model, which means that species are planted to promote the natural process of ecological succession. The project partners with community-based nurseries to provide the seedlings and contracts members of the Landless Workers Movement to carry out the planting activities. Ecological surveys are carried out to assess tree species composition, tree growth and other indicators of the health of the forest corridors and camera traps are installed to monitor their functionality. The project also carries a research component to help develop a certification standard for forest landscape restoration. For this, data on the project’s ecological and socio-economic impacts are collected.
The project partners with community-based nurseries, established and run by local people, to collect the seeds and provide the seedlings for planting. Local people, many of them women, can become financially independent. To carry out the planting activities, members of Brazil's Landless Workers Movement are contracted. This vulnerable group of people have the opportunity to learn valuable skills and earn a living while helping to restore the Atlantic Forest.
The Benefits of Planting 1 Million Trees in this Project
* Carbon calculation methodology
This carbon figure is based on research conducted in the region of Pontal do Paranapanema. The total above-ground and below-ground biomass is estimated to average a sequestration of 317.24 tons of CO2 per hectare over a period of 30 years.
Ditt, E.H., Rocha, M. T., Padua, C.V. Estudos de viabilidade de projetos de carbono para mitigação climática, redução de pobreza e conservação da biodiversidade no Pontal do Paranapanema, São Paulo. In: Carlos Klink. (Ed.). Quanto mais quente melhor? 1ed. Brasília: Peirópolis, 2007, v. 1, p. 139-154.